ความชุกความไม่มั่นคงทางอาหารของประชากร โดยใช้เกณฑ์การวัดประสบการณ์ความไม่มั่นคงทางอาหาร

49 5 0.785 0.911 222565.968 0.864 0.003 6 1.706 1.018 108800.762 0.971 0.060 7 2.982 1.286 119824.373 0.994 0.405 8 b 4.122 1.569 157506.353 0.997 0.702 Notes: a Measurement error can be thought of as the standard deviation (around the respondent severity parameter—which is the mean severity within the raw score) of the true severity of food insecurity of respondents represented by the sampled individual. b Respondent severity parameters and measurement error cannot be calculated for raw scores 0 and 8 using the conditional maximum likelihood methods used in this analysis. Hence, an approximation based on pseudo raw scores 0.5 and 7.5 are used. c Probabilities are based on the thresholds used by FAO to classify respondents into categories of food insecurity. Disaggregation 22. Were results disaggregated by gender, area of residence or any other characteristic? Were there any significant differences found between groups? _____Yes FI by sex, area, quintile (expenditure approach), age group, marital status, work status Significant in area, quintile, age group, work status______________________________